Comments to the US EPA on “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Costs and Benefits in the Rulemaking Process”

Download

Date

Aug. 10, 2018

Authors

Alan Krupnick, Arthur G. Fraas, Richard D. Morgenstern, and Nathan Richardson

Publication

Testimony and Public Comments

Reading time

1 minute

Authors

Alan Krupnick

Senior Fellow; Director, Industry and Fuels Program

Alan Krupnick is a senior fellow at RFF.

Arthur G. Fraas

Visiting Fellow

Arthur Fraas is a visiting fellow at Resources for the Future. At RFF, Fraas works on a variety of issues related to energy and the environment, including projects looking at issues and tradeoffs with energy efficiency regulations, and more.

Richard D. Morgenstern

Senior Fellow

Richard Morgenstern is a senior fellow at RFF. His research focuses on the economic analysis of environmental issues with an emphasis on the costs, benefits, evaluation, and design of environmental policies.

Nathan Richardson

University Fellow

Nathan Richardson is an attorney and university fellow at RFF, where he specializes in environmental law and economics.

Related Content

Common Resources — Sep 17, 2018

EPA's ANPRM on Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Benefit Cost Analysis

We consider some items in the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for EPA’s cost-benefit analysis to be contrary to best economic practice and/o...

Press Release — Jan 3, 2025

White Communities Are More Likely to Enroll in a Western US Wildfire Mitigation Program

A new paper an increase in home protection measures following wildfire is entirely driven by non-Hispanic white households.

In Focus — Dec 18, 2024

In Focus: Perceptions of Environmental Justice

This video shares insights from a recent survey of the views held by Americans about environmental justice, with RFF University Fellow Jon Krosnick.

Press Release — Dec 18, 2024

Americans Support Climate Policies to Help Most Vulnerable

A new survey finds that 47 percent of Americans do not believe that low-income people face greater risks from climate change than high-income people.