Monetizing the Value of Measurements of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity Using the Social Cost of Carbon

This study shows how real options theory in combination with the social cost of carbon may help to calculate the value of information regarding equilibrium climate sensitivity and estimate the relative advantages of two different Earth Observing Systems.

Date

March 29, 2019

Authors

Roger Cooke, Alexander Golub, Bruce Wielicki, Martin Mlynczak, David Young, and Rosemary Rallo Baize

Publication

Journal Article

Reading time

1 minute

Abstract

There has been much work on the value of learning about climate and the value of information regarding the climatic system. The present research moves beyond an abstract hypothesis about future learning and considers concrete Earth Observing Systems that could enhance knowledge of the climatic system and better inform decision makers. This study shows how real options theory in combination with the social cost of carbon may help to calculate the value of information regarding equilibrium climate sensitivity and estimate the relative advantages of two different Earth Observing Systems (EOSs) for learning about ECS. One system aims to improve measurements of decadal global temperature increase and another targets measurements of decadal change of global cloud radiative effect. The paper concludes that a new EOS that substantially reduces the uncertainty in cloud radiative effect would be expected to have more value than improving estimations of the global surface temperature alone.

Topics

Projects

The VALUABLES Consortium

Authors

Roger Cooke

Senior Fellow Emeritus

Roger Cooke is a senior fellow emeritus at RFF. He joined RFF in September 2005 as the first appointee to the Chauncey Starr Chair in Risk Analysis.

Alexander Golub

Bruce Wielicki

Martin Mlynczak

David Young

Rosemary Rallo Baize

Related Content

Working Paper — Dec 9, 2024

Accounting for Biodiversity Loss Raises the Social Cost of CO2

In this working paper, the authors examine how climate change contributes to biodiversity loss and incorporate its nonuse value into the Social Cost of Carbon, emphasizing its role in guiding more comprehensive climate policies.

Report — Sep 24, 2024

Challenges and Opportunities for Incorporating Climate Change’s Impacts on Ocean Systems into the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases

Journal Article — Aug 15, 2024

Equity Weighting Increases the Social Cost of Carbon

This article finds that using an “income weighting” approach would increase the social cost of carbon by a factor of eight by placing greater emphasis on climate’s impacts on the global poor.

Testimony and Public Comments — Apr 10, 2024

Public Comment on the International Foundation for Valuing Impacts' Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology

This comment to the International Foundation for Valuing Impacts addresses the organization's greenhouse gas emissions methodology.