Impacts of EPA’s Finalized Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Standards

Emissions reductions may be met with relatively small costs.

View Journal Article

Date

Jan. 9, 2025

Authors

John Bistline, Aaron Bergman, Geoffrey Blanford, Maxwell Brown, Dallas Burtraw, Maya Domeshek, Allen Fawcett, Anne Hamilton, Gokul Iyer, Jesse Jenkins, Ben King, Hannah Kolus, Amanda Levin, Qian Luo, Kevin Rennert, Molly Robertson, Nicholas Roy, Ethan Russell, Daniel Shawhan, Daniel Steinberg, Anna van Brummen, Grace Van Horn, Aranya Venkatesh, John Weyant, Ryan Wiser, and Alicia Zhao

Publication

Journal Article in Science

Reading time

1 minute

A new article in the journal Science finds that the US Environmental Protection Agency’s May 2024 rules limiting emissions from power plants could reduce US power-sector carbon emissions by 73 to 86 percent below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with 60 to 83 percent without the rules.

The findings, which are the results of modeling conducted by EPRI, Resources for the Future (RFF), and other institutions, represent the most detailed modeling to date on this landmark policy. The nine models used by the research team not only found notable emissions reductions, but a change in power generation: coal-fired power plants retire at quicker rates under the rules while the use of natural gas, renewables, and nuclear either increases or holds steady relative to trends without the rules.

In a range of scenarios with and without the rules, the authors find that the United States falls short of the emissions reductions needed to meet its 2030 economy-wide emissions target and its 2050 net-zero goal.

Authors

John Bistline

EPRI

Geoffrey Blanford

EPRI

Maxwell Brown

Colorado School of Mines

Allen Fawcett

Center for Global Sustainability

Anne Hamilton

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Gokul Iyer

University of Maryland, College Park

Jesse Jenkins

Princeton University

Ben King

Rhodium Group

Hannah Kolus

Rhodium Group

Amanda Levin

Natural Resources Defense Council

Qian Luo

Princeton University

Daniel Steinberg

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Anna van Brummen

Rhodium Group

Grace Van Horn

Center for Applied Environmental Law and Policy

Aranya Venkatesh

EPRI

John Weyant

Stanford University

Ryan Wiser

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Alicia Zhao

University of Maryland, College Park

Related Content