|
|
|
|
|
 | | Juha V. Siikamäki | | Associate Research Director and Fellow | |
|
|
PROFILE |
Juha Siikamäki's research focuses on evaluating the benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of different environmental policy options. His work concentrates on natural ecosystems, such as forests, agricultural landscapes, and coastal ecosystems, and empirically evaluating different options for their management and conservation. Moreover, he has broad interest in public policy evaluations, especially in the context of empirical assessments of consumer preferences and choices.
At RFF since 2004, his recent work has examined nature recreation in the US; global options for preserving forest carbon and biodiversity; potential for improving the cost-effectiveness of biodiversity conservation; valuing ecological benefits from reduced air pollution; and evaluating households’ preferences for energy efficiency. His work has been published in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; Journal of Environmental Economics and Management; Ecological Applications; Land Economics; and Environment. Siikamäki currently serves as the Treasurer of Association of the Environmental and Resource Economists.
|
|
|
|
| Featured Publications | | Nudging Energy Efficiency Behavior: The Role of Information Labels | | Richard G. Newell and Juha Siikamaki | | Allied Social Science Associations (ASSA) Annual Meeting | Association of Environmental and Resource Economists | San Diego, CA | January 5, 2013 | | | | Energy efficiency behavior: The role of information, purchase cost, and individual discount rates | | Richard Newell and Juha Siikamaki | | AERE 2nd Annual Summer Conference Asheville | Association for Enviromental and Resource Economists | Asheville, North Carolina | June 4, 2012 | | | | Global economic potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove loss | | Juha Siikamaki, James Sanchirico, and Sunny Jardine | | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | In press | | | | Potential Biodiversity Benefits from International Programs to Reduce Carbon Emissions from Deforestation | | Juha Siikamaki and Stephen C. Newbold | | Ambio | 2012 | Vol. 41, Supplement 1 | pp.78-89 | | | | Contributions of the U.S. State Park System to Nature Recreation | | Juha Siikamaki | | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | August 2011 | Vol. 108 | pp. 14031-14036 | | | | Evaluating Global Potential for REDD Programs to Protect Biodiversity | | Juha Siikamaki and Stephen C. Newbold | | AERE 2nd Annual Summer Conference Asheville | Association for Enviromental and Resource Economists | Asheville, North Carolina | June 4, 2012 | | | | State Parks: Assessing Their Benefits | | Juha V. Siikamäki | | Resources | 2012 (179) | | | | The State of the Great Outdoors: America's Parks, Public Lands, and Recreation Resources | | Margaret A. Walls, Sarah R Darley, Juha V. Siikamäki | | RFF Report | September 2009 | | | | Prioritizing conservation activities using reserve site selection and population viability analysis with an application to Pacific salmon | | Stephen Newbold and Juha Siikamaki | | Ecological Applications | October 2009 | Vol. 19, No.7 | pp. 1774-1790 | | | | Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Methods. | | Juha Siikamaki and David Layton | | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | 2007 | Vol. 53 | pp. 127-139 | | | | Biodiversity: What it Means, How it Works, and What the Current Issues Are | | Juha V. Siikamäki | | Resources | Spring 2008 (168) | | | | Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs: Predicting Landowners' Enrollment and Opportunity Cost Using a Beta-Binomial Model | | David F. Layton and Juha Siikamaki | | Environmental and Resource Economics | November 2009 | Vol. 44, No.3 | pp. 415-439 | | | | Climate Change and U.S. Agriculture: Examining the Connections | | Juha Siikamaki | | Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development | July/August 2008 | Vol. 50, No. 4 | pp. 36-49. | | | | Valuing Benefits from Ecosystem Improvements using Stated Preference Methods: An Example from Reducing Acidification in the Adirondacks Park | | David A. Evans, H. Spencer Banzhaf, Dallas Burtraw, Alan Krupnick and Juha Siikamaki | | Saving Biological Diversity: Balancing Protection of Endangered species and Ecosystems | Robert A. Askins, Glenn D. Dreyer, Gerald R. Visgilio | New York: Springer | 2008 | | | | Forests, Biodiversity and Avoided Deforestation in Latin America | | Roger A. Sedjo and Juha Siikamaki | | Latin American Development Priorities – Costs and Benefit | Edited by Bjorn Lomborg | NY: Cambridge University Press | 2010 | | | | Using Time Use Data to Examine Outdoor Recreation From 1965 To 2007 | | Juha Siikamaki | | Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Newsletter Essay | November 2009 | Vol. 29, No. 2 | 26-32 | | | | Biodiversity in the United States | | Juha Siikamaki and Jeffrey Chow | | Perspectives on Sustainable Resources in America | Roger Sedjo, ed. | Washington DC: RFF Press | 2008 | | | | Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur – Environmental Criteria. | | Tara Greaver et al. | | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | December 2007 | | | | Assessing U.S. Climate Policy Options | | Raymond J. Kopp, William A. Pizer, Daniel Hall, Richard D. Morgenstern, Juha V. Siikamäki, Joseph E. Aldy, Ian W.H. Parry, Karen L. Palmer, Dallas Burtraw, Mun Ho, Evan M Herrnstadt, Joseph Maher | | RFF Report | November 2007 | | | | How People Value What Nature Provides | | Alan J. Krupnick, Juha V. Siikamäki | | Resources | Spring 2007 (165) | | | | View All Related Publications |
|
|
DISCUSSION PAPERS | | Conservation Return on Investment Analysis: A Review of Results, Methods, and New Directions | | James W. Boyd, Rebecca Epanchin-Niell, Juha V. Siikamäki | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-01 | January 2012 | Abstract: Conservation investments are increasingly evaluated on the basis of their return on investment (ROI). Conservation ROI analysis quantitatively measures the costs, benefits, and risks of investments so conservancies can rank or prioritize them. This paper surveys the existing conservation ROI and related literatures. We organize our synthesis around the way studies treat recurring, core elements of ROI, as a guide for practitioners and consumers of future ROI analyses. ROI analyses involve quantification of a consistent set of elements, including the definition and measurement of the conservation objective as well as identification of the relevant baselines, the type of conservation investments evaluated, and investment costs. We document the state of the art, note some open questions, and provide suggestions for future improvements in data and methods. We also describe ways ROI analysis can be extended to a broader suite of conservation outcomes than biodiversity conservation, which is the typical focus. | | | | Use of Time for Outdoor Recreation in the United States, 1965–2007 | | Juha V. Siikamäki | | RFF Discussion Paper 09-18 | May 2009 | Abstract: This study examines time-use for outdoor recreation during 1965 to 2007. Using data on over 47,000 individuals from six nationally representative time-use surveys, we first document time-use trends between 1965 and 2007. We then develop a two-part instrumental variable censored regression model (a hurdle model) to predict individual-level time-use. Our results show that per capita time-use in outdoor recreation has more than doubled since 1965. This long-term increase was driven largely by increased participation rate. However, in the last decade or two, per capita time-use in outdoor recreation has stayed constant or slightly decreased. This change was driven mostly by reduced time-use by active participants; participation rate has not changed considerably. Demographics, amount of leisure, and other factors all have contributed to changes over time, but their effects and relative importance vary between participation, time-use per active participant, and time periods. | | | | An Update on the Science of Acidification in the Adirondack Park | | Anna Mische John, Dallas Burtraw, David A. Evans, H. Spencer Banzhaf, Alan J. Krupnick, Juha V. Siikamäki | | RFF Discussion Paper 08-11 | May 2008 | Abstract: This paper provides a review of the science pertaining to all aspects of acidification in the Adirondack Park, updating an earlier review of the science (Cook et al. 2002). The review supports an ongoing social science investigation into the willingness to pay for ecological improvements that would result from reduced acid deposition. This paper builds a bridge between the physical science and social science by providing the background that will allow researchers to accurately summarize the crucial elements of ecological status and improvement in a stated preference survey. | | | | Potential Cost-Effectiveness of Incentive Payment Programs for Biological Conservation | | Juha V. Siikamäki, David F. Layton | | RFF Discussion Paper 06-27 | June 2006 | | Related journal article | Abstract: This study assesses the potential cost-effectiveness of incentive payment programs relative to traditional top-down regulatory programs for biological conservation. We develop site-level estimates of the opportunity cost and the nonmonetized biological benefits of protecting biodiversity hotspots in Finnish nonindustrial private forests. We then use these estimates to compare and contrast the cost-effectiveness of alternative conservation programs. Our results suggest that incentive payment programs, which tacitly capitalize on landowners’ private knowledge about the opportunity costs of conservation, may be considerably more cost-effective than traditional top-down regulatory programs. | | | | Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models | | Juha V. Siikamäki, David F. Layton | | RFF Discussion Paper 05-60 | April 2006 | Abstract: This study investigates the convergent validity of discrete choice contingent valuation (CV) and contingent rating/ranking (CR) methods using flexible econometric methods. Our results suggest that CV and CR can produce consistent data (achieve convergent validity) when respondent’s preferred choices and the same changes in environmental quality are considered. We also find that CR models that go beyond modeling the preferred choice and include additional ranks cannot be pooled with the CV models. Accounting for preference heterogeneity via random coefficient models and their flexible structure does not make rejection of the hypothesis of convergent validity less likely, but instead rejects the hypothesis to about the same degree or perhaps more frequently than fixed parameter models commonly used in the literature. | | | | Air Emissions of Ammonia and Methane from Livestock Operations: Valuation and Policy Options | | Jhih-Shyang Shih, Dallas Burtraw, Karen L. Palmer, Juha V. Siikamäki | | RFF Discussion Paper 06-11 | March 2006 | | Related journal article | Abstract: The animal husbandry industry is a major emitter of methane, which is an important greenhouse gas. The industry is also a major emitter of ammonia, which is a precursor of fine particulate matter—arguably, the number-one environment-related public health threat facing the nation. We present an integrated process model of the engineering economics of technologies to reduce methane and ammonia emissions at dairy operations in California. Three policy options are explored: greenhouse gas offset credits for methane control, particulate matter offset credits for ammonia control, and expanded net metering policies to provide revenue for the sale of electricity generated from captured methane gas. Individually, any of these policies appears to be sufficient to provide the economic incentive for farm operators to reduce emissions. We report on initial steps to fully develop the integrated process model that will provide guidance for policymakers. | | | | Incentive Payment Programs for Environmental Protection: A Framework for Eliciting and Estimating Landowners' Willingness to Participate | | David F. Layton, Juha V. Siikamäki | | RFF Discussion Paper 05-57 | December 2005 | Abstract: This paper considers the role of incentive payment programs in eliciting, estimating, and predicting landowners’ conservation enrollments. Using both program participation and the amount of land enrolled, we develop two econometric approaches for predicting enrollments. The first is a multivariate censored regression model that handles zero enrollments and heterogeneity in the opportunity cost of enrollments by combining an inverse hyperbolic sine transformation of enrollments with alternative-specific correlation and random parameters. The second is a beta-binomial model, which recognizes that in practice elicited enrollments are essentially integer valued. We apply these approaches to Finland, where the protection of private nonindustrial forests is an important environmental policy problem. We compare both econometric approaches via cross-validation and find that the beta-binomial model predicts as well as the multivariate censored model yet has fewer parameters. The beta-binomial model also facilitates policy predictions and simulations, which we use to illustrate the framework. | | | | Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Methods | | Juha Siikamaki and D.F. Layton | | | | | | Incentive Payment Programs for Environmental Protection: A Framework for Eliciting and Estimating Landowner's Willingness to Participate | | David F. Layton and Juha Siikamaki | | | | | | Optimal Conservation: Estimating Marginal Costs and Benefits of Protecting Endangered Habitat in Finland | | Juha Siikamaki and David F. Layton | | Also presented at the 14th EARE Conference in Bremen, Germany, June 25, 2005. | | | | | Effectiveness of Voluntary Conservation on Working Landscapes. | | Juha Siikamaki | | | | | | Cost-Effective Habitat Protection: The Case of Pacific Salmon | | S. Newbold, Juha Siikamaki, and M. Clark. | | | | | | Biodiversity in the United States | | Juha Siikamaki and Jeff Chow | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RELATED SUBTOPICS | | Air Pollution, Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, Climate Mitigation, Coastal Resources, Ecosystem Management, Ecosystem Services, Environmental Accounting, Forest Carbon, Forest Conservation, Global Forest Monitoring, Outdoor Recreation, Parks, Refuges, and Wildernesses, Public Lands, Regulation, Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|