| MARKETS | | | Publications | | | A Retrospective Review of Shale Gas Development in the United States: What Led to the Boom? | | Zhongmin Wang, Alan J. Krupnick | | RFF Discussion Paper 13-12 | April 2013 | | Abstract: This is the first academic paper that reviews the economic, policy, and technology history of shale gas development in the United States. The primary objective of the paper is to answer the question of what led to the shale gas boom in the United States to help inform stakeholders in those countries that are attempting to develop their own shale gas resources. This paper is also a case study of the incentive, process, and impact of technology innovations and the role of government in promoting technology innovations in the energy industry. Our review finds that government policy, private entrepreneurship, technology innovations, private land and mineral rights ownership, high natural gas prices in the 2000s, and a number of other factors all made important contributions to the shale gas boom. | | | | Mercury and Air Toxics Standards Analysis Deconstructed: Changing Assumptions, Changing Results | | Blair Beasley, Matthew Woerman, Anthony Paul, Dallas Burtraw, Karen L. Palmer | | RFF Discussion Paper 13-10 | April 2013 | | Abstract: Several recent studies have used simulation models to quantify the potential effects of recent environmental regulations on power plants, including the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), one of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s most expensive regulations. These studies have produced inconsistent results about the effects on the industry, making general conclusions difficult. We attempt to reconcile these differences by representing the variety of assumptions in these studies within a common modeling platform. We find that the assumptions, and their differences from the way MATS will be implemented, make a substantial impact on projected retirement of coal-fired capacity and generation, investments that are required, and emissions reductions. Almost uniformly, the actual regulation, when examined in its final form and in isolation, provides more flexibility than is represented in most models. We find this leads to a smaller impact on the composition of the electricity generating fleet than most studies have predicted. | | | | The Controversy over US Coal and Natural Gas Exports | | Joel Darmstadter | | Issue Brief 13-01 | March 2013 | | | | | | View All Related Publications |
|
|
| Events | | Whither Markets for Environmental Regulation of Air, Water, and Land?  | | December 5, 2012 | | Event Type: First Wednesday Seminar | | Related Topics: Air Quality, Land Use, Water, Policy and Analysis, International | | | | The Role of Border Measures in Unilateral Climate Policy | | September 5, 2012 | | Event Type: First Wednesday Seminar | | Related Topics: Climate, International, Policy and Analysis | | | The Role of Border Measures in the Design of Unilateral Climate Policy  | | September 4, 2012 - September 5, 2012 | | Event Type: Conference | | Related Topics: Climate, International, Policy and Analysis | | | | View All Related Events |
|
|
| Features | | US Shale Gas Development in Review | | The United States has seen rapid recent development of shale gas. What are the factors behind the notable growth in the past decade? And what does it mean for shale gas development elsewhere in the world? RFF scholars Alan Krupnick and Zhongmin Wang examine the history of the US shale gas boom in a new RFF discussion paper. | | Mercury and Air Toxics Standards Analysis Deconstructed: Changing Assumptions, Changing Results | | EPA regulations on mercury and other air pollutants currently under review are the subject of much debate for their potential costs and impacts on the electricity industry. In a new discussion paper, a team of RFF experts examines the assumptions behind several studies that have analyzed the potential effects of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, finding that the impacts may be less rigid and less uncertain than suggested by some models. | | Thinking Like an Economist Within the Complex Climate Policy Regime | | Building on recent work that highlights the need to account for institutions in crafting economic solutions to environmental problems, RFF scholars Matt Woerman and Dallas Burtraw look specifically to the implementation of climate policy—and how incentive-based thinking can help. | | View All Related Features |
|
|
|
|
| RESEARCHERS | | Brennan, Timothy J. | | Burtraw, Dallas | | Darmstadter, Joel | | Kopp, Raymond J. | | Kuwayama, Yusuke | | Linn, Joshua | | Mares, Jan | | Muehlenbachs, Lucija Anna | | Salant, Stephen W. | | Sedjo, Roger A. | | Shabman, Leonard A. | | Sharp, Phil | | Williams III, Roberton C. |
|
|
|