| PUBLICATIONS | | Filtered by Allen Blackman | | | | | Sort by: Title | Date | Results per page: |
| | Inside RFF | | Jintao Xu, Karen L. Palmer, Sheila M. Olmstead, Richard D. Morgenstern, Allen Blackman, Juha V. Siikamäki, Timothy J. Brennan, P. Lynn Scarlett, James N. Sanchirico, Yusuke Kuwayama , Antung Anthony Liu, C. Boyden Gray | | Resources | 2013 (182) | | | | | | Does Tourism Eco-Certification Pay? Costa Rica’s Blue Flag Program | | Allen Blackman, Maria Naranjo, Juan Robalino, Francisco Alpízar, Jorge Rivera | | RFF Discussion Paper EfD 12-13 | November 2012 | | Abstract: Tourism associated with beaches, protected areas, and other natural resources often has serious environmental impacts. The problem is especially acute in developing countries, where nature-based tourism is increasingly important and environmental regulation is typically weak. Eco-certification programs—voluntary initiatives certifying that tourism operators meet defined environmental standards—promise to help address this problem by creating a private-sector system of inducements, monitoring, and enforcement. But to do that, they must provide incentives for tourism operators to participate, such as price premiums and more customers. Rigorous evidence on such benefits is virtually nonexistent. To help fill this gap, we use detailed panel data to analyze the effects of the Blue Flag Program, a leading international eco-certification program, in Costa Rica, where nature-based tourism has caused significant environmental damage. We use new hotel investment to proxy for private benefits, and fixed effects and propensity score matching to control for self-selection bias. We find that past Blue Flag certification has a statistically and economically significant effect on new hotel investment, particularly in luxury hotels. Our results suggest that certification has spurred the construction of 12 to 19 additional hotels per year in our regression samples. These findings provide some of the first evidence that eco-certification can generate private benefits for tourism operators in developing countries and therefore has the potential to improve their environmental performance. | | | | Does Tourism Eco-Certification Pay? Costa Rica’s Blue Flag Program | | Allen Blackman, Maria Naranjo, Juan Robalino, Francisco Alpízar, Jorge Rivera | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-50 | November 2012 | | Abstract: Tourism associated with beaches, protected areas, and other natural resources often has serious environmental impacts. The problem is especially acute in developing countries, where nature-based tourism is increasingly important and environmental regulation is typically weak. Eco-certification programs—voluntary initiatives certifying that tourism operators meet defined environmental standards—promise to help address this problem by creating a private-sector system of inducements, monitoring, and enforcement. But to do that, they must provide incentives for tourism operators to participate, such as price premiums and more customers. Rigorous evidence on such benefits is virtually nonexistent. To help fill this gap, we use detailed panel data to analyze the effects of the Blue Flag Program, a leading international eco-certification program, in Costa Rica, where nature-based tourism has caused significant environmental damage. We use new hotel investment to proxy for private benefits, and fixed effects and propensity score matching to control for self-selection bias. We find that past Blue Flag certification has a statistically and economically significant effect on new hotel investment, particularly in luxury hotels. Our results suggest that certification has spurred the construction of 12 to 19 additional hotels per year in our regression samples. These findings provide some of the first evidence that eco-certification can generate private benefits for tourism operators in developing countries and therefore has the potential to improve their environmental performance. | | | | Does Ecocertification Have Environmental Benefits? Organic Coffee in Costa Rica | | A. Blackman and M. Naranjo | | Ecological Economics | forthcoming | | | | | | Resources Magazine: 180 | | Edward B. Barbier, Allen Blackman, Maureen L. Cropper, Róger Madrigal, David Popp, Drew Shindell, Juha V. Siikamäki, Thomas Sterner, Jintao Xu, Phil Sharp | | Resources | 2012 (180) | | | | | | Environmental Management in Developing Countries | | Allen Blackman | | Resources | 2012 (180) | | | | | | Eco-certification in Developing Countries: Truth in Advertising? | | Allen Blackman | | Resources | 2012 (180) | | | | | | Does Ecocertification in Developing Countries Boost Compliance? ISO 14001 Certification in Mexico. | | Allen Blackman | | Journal of Regulatory Economics | Related Discussion Paper 11-39 | | | | | | What Drives Voluntary Eco-Certification in Mexico?” | | A. Blackman and S. Guerrero. | | Journal of Comparative Economics. | 40(2) | 256-268 | | | | | | Ex Post Evaluation of Forest Conservation Policies Using Remote Sensing Data: An Introduction and Practical Guide | | Allen Blackman | | RFF Discussion Paper EfD 12-05 | March 2012 | | Abstract: Rigorous, objective evaluation of forest conservation policies in developing countries is needed to ensure that the limited financial, human, and political resources devoted to these policies are put to good use. Yet such evaluations remain uncommon. Recent advances in conservation best practices, the widening availability of high-resolution remotely sensed land-cover data, and the dissemination of geographic information system capacity have created significant opportunities to reverse this trend. This paper provides a nontechnical introduction and practical guide to a relatively low cost method that relies on remote sensing data to support ex post analysis of forest conservation policies. It describes the defining features of this approach, catalogues and briefly reviews the studies that have used it, discusses the requisite data, explains the principal challenges to its use and the empirical strategies to overcome them, provides some practical guidance on modeling choices, and describes in detail two recent case studies. | | | | Ex Post Evaluation of Forest Conservation Policies Using Remote Sensing Data: An Introduction and Practical Guide | | Allen Blackman | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-13 | March 2012 | | Abstract: Rigorous, objective evaluation of forest conservation policies in developing countries is needed to ensure that the limited financial, human, and political resources devoted to these policies are put to good use. Yet such evaluations remain uncommon. Recent advances in conservation best practices, the widening availability of high-resolution remotely sensed land-cover data, and the dissemination of geographic information system capacity have created significant opportunities to reverse this trend. This paper provides a nontechnical introduction and practical guide to a relatively low cost method that relies on remote sensing data to support ex post analysis of forest conservation policies. It describes the defining features of this approach, catalogues and briefly reviews the studies that have used it, discusses the requisite data, explains the principal challenges to its use and the empirical strategies to overcome them, provides some practical guidance on modeling choices, and describes in detail two recent case studies. | | | | Voluntary Environmental Agreements in Developing Countries: The Colombian Experience | | Allen Blackman, Eduardo Uribe, Bart van Hoof, Thomas P. Lyon | | RFF Discussion Paper 12-06 | February 2012 | | Abstract: According to proponents, voluntary agreements (VAs) negotiated with polluters sidestep weak institutions and other barriers to conventional environmental regulation in developing countries. Yet little is known about their effectiveness. We examine VAs in Colombia, a global leader in the use of these policies. We find that the main motive for using VAs has been to build capacity needed for broader environmental regulatory reform. Their additional effect on environmental performance has been questionable. These findings suggest that in developing countries, VAs may be best suited to capacity building, not environmental management per se. | | | | Voluntary Environmental Agreements in Developing Countries: The Colombian Experience | | Allen Blackman, Eduardo Uribe, Bart van Hoof, Thomas P. Lyon | | RFF Discussion Paper EfD 12-04 | February 2012 | | Abstract: According to proponents, voluntary agreements (VAs) negotiated with polluters sidestep weak institutions and other barriers to conventional environmental regulation in developing countries. Yet little is known about their effectiveness. We examine VAs in Colombia, a global leader in the use of these policies. We find that the main motive for using VAs has been to build capacity needed for broader environmental regulatory reform. Their additional effect on environmental performance has been questionable. These findings suggest that in developing | | | | Land Cover Change in Agroforestry: Shade Coffee in El Salvador | | A. Blackman, B. Ávalos-Sartorio, and J. Chow | | Land Economics | February 2012 | 88(1) | pp. 75-101 | | | | | | Health Impacts of Power-Exporting Plants in Northern Mexico | | Allen Blackman, Santosh Chandru, Alberto Mendoza-Domínguez, Armistead G. Russell | | RFF Discussion Paper 11-18 | January 2012 | | Abstract: In the past two decades, rapid population and economic growth on the U.S.–Mexico border has spurred a dramatic increase in electricity demand. In response, American energy multinationals have built power plants just south of the border that export most of their electricity to the United States. This development has stirred considerable controversy because these plants effectively skirt U.S. environmental air pollution regulations in a severely degraded international airshed. Yet to our knowledge, this concern has not been subjected to rigorous scrutiny. This paper uses a suite of air dispersion, health impacts, and valuation models to assess the human health damages in the United States and Mexico caused by air emissions from two power-exporting plants in Mexicali, Baja California. We find that these emissions have limited but nontrivial health impacts, mostly by exacerbating particulate pollution in the United States, and we value these damages at more than half a million dollars per year. These findings demonstrate that power-exporting plants can have cross-border health effects and bolster the case for systematically evaluating their environmental impacts. | | | | Health Impacts of Power-Exporting Plants in Northern Mexico | | Allen Blackman, Santosh Chandru, Alberto Mendoza-Domínguez, Armistead G. Russell | | RFF Discussion Paper EfD 11-03 | January 2012 | | Abstract: In the past two decades, rapid population and economic growth on the U.S.–Mexico border has spurred a dramatic increase in electricity demand. In response, American energy multinationals have built power plants just south of the border that export most of their electricity to the United States. This development has stirred considerable controversy because these plants effectively skirt U.S. environmental air pollution regulations in a severely degraded international airshed. Yet to our knowledge, this concern has not been subjected to rigorous scrutiny. This paper uses a suite of air dispersion, health impacts, and valuation models to assess the human health damages in the United States and Mexico caused by air emissions from two power-exporting plants in Mexicali, Baja California. We find that these emissions have limited but nontrivial health impacts, mostly by exacerbating particulate pollution in the United States, and we value these damages at more than half a million dollars per year. These findings demonstrate that power-exporting plants can have cross-border health effects and bolster the case for systematically evaluating their environmental impacts. | | | | Fuel Tax Incidence in Costa Rica: Gasoline versus Diesel | | Allen Blackman, Rebecca Osakwe, and Francisco Alpizar | | Fuel Taxes and the Poor: The Distributional Effects of Gasoline Taxation and Their Implications for Climate Policy | Thomas Sterner, ed. | RFF Press | 2011 | Chapter 5 | | | | | | Producer-level Benefits of Sustainability Certification | | A. Blackman and J. Rivera | | Conservation Biology | December 2011 | Vol. 25, No. 6 | pp. 1176-1185 | | | | | | Does Public Disclosure Reduce Pollution? Evidence from India’s Pulp and Paper Industry | | N. Powers, A. Blackman, U. Narain, and T. Lyon | | Environmental and Resource Economics | September 2011 | Vol. 50, No. 1 | pp. 131-155 | | | | | | Does Eco-CertificationBoost Regulatory Compliance in Developing Countries? ISO 14001 in Mexico | | Allen Blackman | | RFF Discussion Paper EfD 11-08 | August 2011 | | Abstract: Private sector initiatives certifying that producers of goods and services adhere to defined environmental process standards are increasingly popular worldwide. According to proponents, they can circumvent chronic barriers to effective public sector environmental regulation in developing countries. But eco-certification programs will have limited effects on producers’ environmental performance if, as one would expect, they select for those already meeting certification standards. Rigorous evaluations of the environmental effects of eco-certification in developing countries that control for selection bias are rare. The author used plant-level data on more than 80,000 Mexican facilities to determine whether ISO 14001 series certification of environmental management systems boosts regulatory compliance. | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| FILTER PUBLICATIONS | | By Topic | | | By Type | | | By Author | | | | Display All Publications |
|
|
|
|
|